![Megan Fox Without Make-Up megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox Without Make-Up](http://pinoytutorial.com/lifebytes/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Megan-Fox.jpg)
Yanwoo
Aug 6, 02:00 PM
Was just trying to price out an IMac on the Apple store and the option of upgrade the keyboard/mouse to a wireless version was gone??
Something new in the offing to be announced tomorrow perhaps??
Something new in the offing to be announced tomorrow perhaps??
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b105/1234567_/megan-fox-high-school-pics.jpg)
Magrathea
Apr 5, 11:44 PM
I've been using Premier Pro CS5 on a 2008 MBP for about a week now. I'm a former FCP user. The mercury engine thing does work but only for all but the simplest of editing on my machine - I use AVCH footage Panny HMC40 and DLSR (h.264) Canon 7D and yes you can drag it onto the timeline directly without Transcode BUT add an effect or simple color correction or title and the footage is not playable at all (on my poor machine) without doing a render. Never had to do this with FCP BUT of course I had to wait for the Transcoded to ProREs 422.
So in summary:
![without make-up megan fox without makeup. without make-up](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_S_JldCDb8rA/S68RQBZm6nI/AAAAAAAAACs/-nfrA_5_ldU/s1600/megan-fox-profile.jpg)
without make-up
![megan fox without makeup on. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup on.](http://www.evilbeetgossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/57072663meganfox410200911351pm.jpg)
megan fox without makeup on.
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_l4blipK3B-s/SmKo_0gXZNI/AAAAAAAAAHE/9ZYlb22hsk8/s400/5143681_042950.jpg)
megan fox without makeup.
![Megan Fox Without Makeup: megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox Without Makeup:](http://talkingmakeup.com/pics/news2/fox106.jpg)
Megan Fox Without Makeup:
![Without Makeup on 04 25th, megan fox without makeup. Without Makeup on 04 25th,](http://withoutmake.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/drew-barrymore-without-makeup.jpg)
Without Makeup on 04 25th,
![megan fox makeup and hair. megan fox without makeup. megan fox makeup and hair.](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_S_JldCDb8rA/S68RVoXqSkI/AAAAAAAAADE/MCpjMkNiR1E/s1600/megan-fox-back.jpg)
megan fox makeup and hair.
![megan fox without makeup on. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup on.](http://www.deviantart.com/download/93524606/Megan_Fox_make_up_by_Brianne22.jpg)
megan fox without makeup on.
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_2Wraxo-hP7o/TBrm63K5xVI/AAAAAAAACD4/6nS1klOF5Ok/s1600/kristen_stewart_without_makeup_3.0.0.0x0.400x550.jpeg.jpg)
megan fox without makeup.
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://www.fotolive.org/data/media/439/Megan-Fox-Makeup-Photos-4db0bac0d83e3.jpg)
megan fox without makeup.
![The amount of makeup she got megan fox without makeup. The amount of makeup she got](http://www.buzzpatrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/megan_fox_cate-blanchett-armani-1.jpg)
The amount of makeup she got
![Megan Fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox without makeup.](http://www.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/Entertainment/2010/Megan%2520Fox%2520NM%2520ksugdf_slideshow_604x500.jpg)
Megan Fox without makeup.
![Fox without make-apr megan fox without makeup. Fox without make-apr](http://www.fotolive.org/data/media/439/Megan-Fox-Makeup-Photos-4db0bae73dcde.jpg)
Fox without make-apr
So in summary:
![without make-up megan fox without makeup. without make-up](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_S_JldCDb8rA/S68RQBZm6nI/AAAAAAAAACs/-nfrA_5_ldU/s1600/megan-fox-profile.jpg)
Chundles
Jul 20, 09:21 AM
No I think you are confused. :) I meant "Is having more cores, lets say 8, more efficient than one big core equal in processing power to the 8 cores?"
Well next time say what you mean. It makes more sense. ;)
Well next time say what you mean. It makes more sense. ;)
![megan fox without makeup on. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup on.](http://www.evilbeetgossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/57072663meganfox410200911351pm.jpg)
leekohler
Apr 28, 05:44 PM
all want to know is was why it always has to go to name calling..be it..wacko christians, teabaggers or racists conservatives..it seems like every thread any of the liberals on the forum posts always goes to calling names at whatever group it is that they have a problem with today.
Well, you tell me what we're supposed to call people who do things like this? Sane, sensible people? They aren't. I for one am not going to treat a bunch of idiots in tin foil hats like they're respectable. Same goes for people who wish to deny me rights. I'm sorry, they have not earned my respect.
Well, you tell me what we're supposed to call people who do things like this? Sane, sensible people? They aren't. I for one am not going to treat a bunch of idiots in tin foil hats like they're respectable. Same goes for people who wish to deny me rights. I'm sorry, they have not earned my respect.
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_l4blipK3B-s/SmKo_0gXZNI/AAAAAAAAAHE/9ZYlb22hsk8/s400/5143681_042950.jpg)
grue
Apr 12, 12:56 AM
I like Motion, just wish the timeline was a little better.
People actually use Motion, for actual work?
Motion is a lot like After Effects, if After Effects' mom got drunk, did some crank and tossed herself down a flight of stairs every Friday night during her pregnancy, and then delivered a breech baby with the cord wrapped around its neck.
and then dropped it.
twice.
People actually use Motion, for actual work?
Motion is a lot like After Effects, if After Effects' mom got drunk, did some crank and tossed herself down a flight of stairs every Friday night during her pregnancy, and then delivered a breech baby with the cord wrapped around its neck.
and then dropped it.
twice.
![Megan Fox Without Makeup: megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox Without Makeup:](http://talkingmakeup.com/pics/news2/fox106.jpg)
marksman
Mar 31, 04:37 PM
no, the question is: "Is this evil?" when google starts rejecting Facebook Android phones, or android versions using Bing and not Google...
thats the question.
I don't think it is evil. It is crazy for people to pretend like Google makes Android to be benevolent and help the world. They have financial motives, and they have to protect their interests. Removing Google as search is probably going to be a huge no-no. It is kind of dumb that anyone has even tried to do that... That is part of the problem. Some of the carriers/manufacturers are stupid.
They have disrespected what Google has done for them and forced Google to clamp down. When someone gives you something for free and does a lot of work for you, you can at least respect their position and understand when you do things that might be stepping on their toes.
That is the real problem with the android commodity market though. It is not google, it is all the second rate manufacturers who sucked at making smartphones before Apple and Google, and continue to do dumb things to this day.
You mix a more general usage based OS with a hardware marketplace filled with knuckleheads, and you end up with the mess that is the Android hardware market and ecosystem.
thats the question.
I don't think it is evil. It is crazy for people to pretend like Google makes Android to be benevolent and help the world. They have financial motives, and they have to protect their interests. Removing Google as search is probably going to be a huge no-no. It is kind of dumb that anyone has even tried to do that... That is part of the problem. Some of the carriers/manufacturers are stupid.
They have disrespected what Google has done for them and forced Google to clamp down. When someone gives you something for free and does a lot of work for you, you can at least respect their position and understand when you do things that might be stepping on their toes.
That is the real problem with the android commodity market though. It is not google, it is all the second rate manufacturers who sucked at making smartphones before Apple and Google, and continue to do dumb things to this day.
You mix a more general usage based OS with a hardware marketplace filled with knuckleheads, and you end up with the mess that is the Android hardware market and ecosystem.
![Without Makeup on 04 25th, megan fox without makeup. Without Makeup on 04 25th,](http://withoutmake.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/drew-barrymore-without-makeup.jpg)
NJRonbo
Jun 14, 06:01 AM
iBrad,
What did I miss here?
Going to RS today to turn in my iPhone. I don't know what to
make of the quote you provided but will there be any
restrictions in the upgrade purchase I want to make?
What did I miss here?
Going to RS today to turn in my iPhone. I don't know what to
make of the quote you provided but will there be any
restrictions in the upgrade purchase I want to make?
![megan fox makeup and hair. megan fox without makeup. megan fox makeup and hair.](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_S_JldCDb8rA/S68RVoXqSkI/AAAAAAAAADE/MCpjMkNiR1E/s1600/megan-fox-back.jpg)
0815
Mar 31, 04:16 PM
Interesting ... I was always told by Android Fans that the system is so "open" and not "fragmented" ... hmmm ... looks like google disagrees and admits it is fragmented and that 'closed' is better :D
![megan fox without makeup on. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup on.](http://www.deviantart.com/download/93524606/Megan_Fox_make_up_by_Brianne22.jpg)
Popeye206
Apr 6, 04:45 PM
Dude, you forgot to use your android fan-filter. :p
This is why the xoom won't sell as well as the ipad. It needs to offer a low-end introductory model.
Andy Ihnatko wrote if an ipad competitor were to have a weekend retreat about the goals of their tablet, then a sub $500 price wouldn't be a bad place to start. Granted, that can't be its only feature, because Dell has proven that a cheap price won't bring them in droves. However, if that's the starting point and then the manufacturer adds the requisite features, the tablet might do well.
I don't think price is the issue. It's more complex than that.
First, have you actually played with or used a Xoom? Technically, very nice and cool. Consumer-wise, confusing and weird. Even the demo apps on the thing were not all that great and a couple actually made it look bad.
The iPad is sooooo much easier and smoother. So much more consumer friendly and appealing.
Second, iPad is the standard. The iPad, like the iPhone, is the standard for tablets and consumers tend to migrate to "the standard". Why? It's safe.
Third... Momentum. Consumers see iPads selling like crazy. So, the more they sell, the more people want them. Everyone wants to follow the crowd... just like Lemmings.
iPad = Low risk. It's easy to see that if you Buy an iPad, you're buying a device that is going to be there for a while. Buying a Xoom is risky, unproven and if you buy one, you might have just bought a dead end product. Just like Samsung has already proven with the Tab 1.0. The iPad is a safe purchase.
So, it's more than USB port and processors that is going to knock Apple off the Tablet thrown. Other Tablet makers are going to need to hit many aspects of the consumer to sway them away.
Xoom.... I say Fail.
BTW... the Xoom at the Best Buy here is broken... been that way for two weeks now according to the sales guy.
This is why the xoom won't sell as well as the ipad. It needs to offer a low-end introductory model.
Andy Ihnatko wrote if an ipad competitor were to have a weekend retreat about the goals of their tablet, then a sub $500 price wouldn't be a bad place to start. Granted, that can't be its only feature, because Dell has proven that a cheap price won't bring them in droves. However, if that's the starting point and then the manufacturer adds the requisite features, the tablet might do well.
I don't think price is the issue. It's more complex than that.
First, have you actually played with or used a Xoom? Technically, very nice and cool. Consumer-wise, confusing and weird. Even the demo apps on the thing were not all that great and a couple actually made it look bad.
The iPad is sooooo much easier and smoother. So much more consumer friendly and appealing.
Second, iPad is the standard. The iPad, like the iPhone, is the standard for tablets and consumers tend to migrate to "the standard". Why? It's safe.
Third... Momentum. Consumers see iPads selling like crazy. So, the more they sell, the more people want them. Everyone wants to follow the crowd... just like Lemmings.
iPad = Low risk. It's easy to see that if you Buy an iPad, you're buying a device that is going to be there for a while. Buying a Xoom is risky, unproven and if you buy one, you might have just bought a dead end product. Just like Samsung has already proven with the Tab 1.0. The iPad is a safe purchase.
So, it's more than USB port and processors that is going to knock Apple off the Tablet thrown. Other Tablet makers are going to need to hit many aspects of the consumer to sway them away.
Xoom.... I say Fail.
BTW... the Xoom at the Best Buy here is broken... been that way for two weeks now according to the sales guy.
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_2Wraxo-hP7o/TBrm63K5xVI/AAAAAAAACD4/6nS1klOF5Ok/s1600/kristen_stewart_without_makeup_3.0.0.0x0.400x550.jpeg.jpg)
Peace
Aug 5, 04:01 PM
I can't wait for Monday. I'll be working that day, so I am going to try to watch the keynote before reading any updates. I even have the Quicktime Events page bookmarked. :D I figured I would be more surprised by taking this route.
This is the first WWDC I'm really looking forward to, mainly because of what we're going to see... Leopard in action! :D
Edit: Peace, that's not entirely true. None of us know whether Apple will release Cinema Displays with iSights built-in. I'd say it is unlikely, but you never know until it actually happens.
Just an opinion p0intblank.We all have em :)
This is the first WWDC I'm really looking forward to, mainly because of what we're going to see... Leopard in action! :D
Edit: Peace, that's not entirely true. None of us know whether Apple will release Cinema Displays with iSights built-in. I'd say it is unlikely, but you never know until it actually happens.
Just an opinion p0intblank.We all have em :)
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://www.fotolive.org/data/media/439/Megan-Fox-Makeup-Photos-4db0bac0d83e3.jpg)
Yanwoo
Aug 6, 02:00 PM
Was just trying to price out an IMac on the Apple store and the option of upgrade the keyboard/mouse to a wireless version was gone??
Something new in the offing to be announced tomorrow perhaps??
Something new in the offing to be announced tomorrow perhaps??
![The amount of makeup she got megan fox without makeup. The amount of makeup she got](http://www.buzzpatrol.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/megan_fox_cate-blanchett-armani-1.jpg)
jonnysods
Apr 6, 08:02 AM
Yikes! Better offload my copy of the current version of FCS before it drops too low.
Any takers? :D
Any takers? :D
![Megan Fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox without makeup.](http://www.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/Entertainment/2010/Megan%2520Fox%2520NM%2520ksugdf_slideshow_604x500.jpg)
littleman23408
Nov 30, 03:15 PM
Anyone have any tips to complete the top gear special challenge? I can't manage to get around all those bus'
![Fox without make-apr megan fox without makeup. Fox without make-apr](http://www.fotolive.org/data/media/439/Megan-Fox-Makeup-Photos-4db0bae73dcde.jpg)
jkane08
Apr 6, 07:19 AM
I've been using Premier Pro CS5 on a 2008 MBP....
![megan fox before famous. megan megan fox without makeup. megan fox before famous. megan](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VNW2zWCGc50/TZ6zPvl1JEI/AAAAAAAAAKI/vngXD6c0xxQ/s1600/megan-fox-makeup.jpg)
megan fox before famous. megan
![without her makeup? megan fox without makeup. without her makeup?](http://withoutmake.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/megan-fox-tattoo.jpg)
without her makeup?
![Megan Fox: megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox:](http://img.buzznet.com/assets/imgx/7/8/9/9/1/8/1/orig-7899181.jpg)
Megan Fox:
![Megan Fox is seen her with no megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox is seen her with no](http://www.zeromakeup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/megan-fox-no-makeup.jpg)
Megan Fox is seen her with no
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3462/3254989772_ff07df8103.jpg)
megan fox without makeup.
![megan fox before famous. megan megan fox without makeup. megan fox before famous. megan](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VNW2zWCGc50/TZ6zPvl1JEI/AAAAAAAAAKI/vngXD6c0xxQ/s1600/megan-fox-makeup.jpg)
rosalindavenue
Mar 31, 03:18 PM
Not a problem for me. HTC does a great job keeping phones updated.
Spoken like someone who never owned an Eris.
Spoken like someone who never owned an Eris.
![without her makeup? megan fox without makeup. without her makeup?](http://withoutmake.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/megan-fox-tattoo.jpg)
fivepoint
Apr 27, 02:57 PM
EDIT: They probably DO want the controversy to continue! If I was in his shoes I would be eating it up. Every story on a right-wing birther makes the centerists even more alienated from the right.
I think it's definitely a political 'win' for him... that much is for sure. Just one of the many reasons I've been saying to let the issue die for a long time, although I always thought the best way to do it would be for him to just release the damn thing. Then he does it, and this crap happens.
do you even know who generated the PDF? Perhaps the state of Hawaii set up an editable blank form for their use?
Probably someone in Hawaii originally.
could be you 2 are using different version of Illustrator or have different settings on them.
I have only played with Illustrator/ photohop ect but I would not be surprised that it could automatically being doing that when you open the file trying to detected Text and signatures and giving you the ability to remove/move them easily for editing purposes.
Hell I while I was working I scanned in a document and used software to pull of my signature and save it so i could easily attached it to other documents I was emailing out. Mind you some security got embeded in the file when I was putting it on other PDFs.
could be any number of reasons.
Naw, it's far more likely that I'm a liar.
You said you opened the file in Indesign which is what sparked my interest, because that's something you can't technically do. We've already established long ago that you're untrustworthy, so it's fair to be suspicious.
Sure there are. Been designing since before you were born. This file does not have layers. It has objects within one group. A document created in 1961 will have been scanned, possible inadvertently split into sections as it's not even a linked group or even a compound path. MattSepata is correct to some extent, but I doubt it's been OCRed. Just a crappily-made PDF... which hasn't even been security-locked.
Nice try, but no cookie, Sherlock.
WTF are you talking about? I'm not 'trying' anything. You're just pointing out how ignorant and blinded by bias you really are by your attacks on me. I specifically made the post so that someone could explain it to the rest of us, after specifically explaining I thought there was almost certainly a reasonable explanation. You see what you want to see, nothing more. Amazing that anyone ever wonders why conservatives never stay around these parts, your level of debate is at rock bottom. Amusing, but sad as always, Blue.
To help 5P understand: Government can not do anything right, not even scan a document and make a lousy secured PDF :p:p
;) Clearly.
Is there an explanation for why it matters to you and all the birthers who buy into this nonsense? I'd love to know which right-wing website had instructions for birthers wanting to "test" the image in Illustrator. It's pretty obvious you were following some fringe-website instructions. I highly doubt you just "happened" to open it in Illustrator and then do whatever. I mean, you aren't a graphic designer.
Buy into what nonsense? What did I BUY into? I simply asked so that I would know. I guess asking logical questions makes you a raging bible-thumping birther neo con. ;) Also, Inever said I 'happened' top open it in Illustrator. I saw it on Drudge, and thought to myself... 'no way, they wouldn't make that big of a mistake' meaning, give the birthers such obvious ammunition... so I tested it myself. Thanks for pointing out your same sick desire to twist everything I say just like Lee and Blue.
I think it's definitely a political 'win' for him... that much is for sure. Just one of the many reasons I've been saying to let the issue die for a long time, although I always thought the best way to do it would be for him to just release the damn thing. Then he does it, and this crap happens.
do you even know who generated the PDF? Perhaps the state of Hawaii set up an editable blank form for their use?
Probably someone in Hawaii originally.
could be you 2 are using different version of Illustrator or have different settings on them.
I have only played with Illustrator/ photohop ect but I would not be surprised that it could automatically being doing that when you open the file trying to detected Text and signatures and giving you the ability to remove/move them easily for editing purposes.
Hell I while I was working I scanned in a document and used software to pull of my signature and save it so i could easily attached it to other documents I was emailing out. Mind you some security got embeded in the file when I was putting it on other PDFs.
could be any number of reasons.
Naw, it's far more likely that I'm a liar.
You said you opened the file in Indesign which is what sparked my interest, because that's something you can't technically do. We've already established long ago that you're untrustworthy, so it's fair to be suspicious.
Sure there are. Been designing since before you were born. This file does not have layers. It has objects within one group. A document created in 1961 will have been scanned, possible inadvertently split into sections as it's not even a linked group or even a compound path. MattSepata is correct to some extent, but I doubt it's been OCRed. Just a crappily-made PDF... which hasn't even been security-locked.
Nice try, but no cookie, Sherlock.
WTF are you talking about? I'm not 'trying' anything. You're just pointing out how ignorant and blinded by bias you really are by your attacks on me. I specifically made the post so that someone could explain it to the rest of us, after specifically explaining I thought there was almost certainly a reasonable explanation. You see what you want to see, nothing more. Amazing that anyone ever wonders why conservatives never stay around these parts, your level of debate is at rock bottom. Amusing, but sad as always, Blue.
To help 5P understand: Government can not do anything right, not even scan a document and make a lousy secured PDF :p:p
;) Clearly.
Is there an explanation for why it matters to you and all the birthers who buy into this nonsense? I'd love to know which right-wing website had instructions for birthers wanting to "test" the image in Illustrator. It's pretty obvious you were following some fringe-website instructions. I highly doubt you just "happened" to open it in Illustrator and then do whatever. I mean, you aren't a graphic designer.
Buy into what nonsense? What did I BUY into? I simply asked so that I would know. I guess asking logical questions makes you a raging bible-thumping birther neo con. ;) Also, Inever said I 'happened' top open it in Illustrator. I saw it on Drudge, and thought to myself... 'no way, they wouldn't make that big of a mistake' meaning, give the birthers such obvious ammunition... so I tested it myself. Thanks for pointing out your same sick desire to twist everything I say just like Lee and Blue.
![Megan Fox: megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox:](http://img.buzznet.com/assets/imgx/7/8/9/9/1/8/1/orig-7899181.jpg)
rezenclowd3
Dec 7, 02:53 PM
So another patch for today adding mechanical damage. Must have the newest firmware...
![Megan Fox is seen her with no megan fox without makeup. Megan Fox is seen her with no](http://www.zeromakeup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/megan-fox-no-makeup.jpg)
CoffeeMonkey
Mar 22, 02:12 PM
Widescreen is great for movie watching, and the spec-lover in me is all over that... but it�s not very flexible for portrait use. (Which is how you hold a tablet one-handed, and is how you see the most content on a web page or scrolling document.)
I hear that the PlayBook is really easy to hold one-handed. If you know what I mean.
I hear that the PlayBook is really easy to hold one-handed. If you know what I mean.
![megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup. megan fox without makeup.](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3462/3254989772_ff07df8103.jpg)
0815
Apr 25, 02:27 PM
Prove it.
Not guilty until proven guilty ... your turn to proof that they have the data. There is zero evidence for that, no matter how often you repeat the claim.
Not guilty until proven guilty ... your turn to proof that they have the data. There is zero evidence for that, no matter how often you repeat the claim.
LagunaSol
Apr 6, 04:03 PM
"Hahaha, look at the Android tablets, they only ship 1/10 of iPads." - 12 months later: Well you know...
Yeah, good luck to Android tablets without carrier BOGO deals, Apple carrier exclusivity, and greater retail distribution than Apple. None of these factors apply in the tablet market.
I think you (and Google) are going to be disappointed.
Yeah, good luck to Android tablets without carrier BOGO deals, Apple carrier exclusivity, and greater retail distribution than Apple. None of these factors apply in the tablet market.
I think you (and Google) are going to be disappointed.
slackpacker
Apr 10, 07:21 PM
Can't wait for NAB
artpease
Aug 5, 06:14 PM
Point is, without an IR sensor in the display, you wouldn't have the OPTION of hiding the computer away.
Yes, but just my opinion, Apple needs to get over this 'Only new computers get FrontRow' crap and provide a USB repeater. Geez, people aren't buying new computers to get FrontRow, they're buying them to get Intel, so providing FrontRow to legacy systems isn't going to cripple sales! The only error in that opinion might be the mini, both the G4 and Intel minis are so crippled, neither makes any sense in a home theater setting but, providing a USB repeater for the G4 mini might effect a few Intel mini sales.
Yes, but just my opinion, Apple needs to get over this 'Only new computers get FrontRow' crap and provide a USB repeater. Geez, people aren't buying new computers to get FrontRow, they're buying them to get Intel, so providing FrontRow to legacy systems isn't going to cripple sales! The only error in that opinion might be the mini, both the G4 and Intel minis are so crippled, neither makes any sense in a home theater setting but, providing a USB repeater for the G4 mini might effect a few Intel mini sales.
BLUELION
Apr 25, 02:21 PM
...The "tracking" is widely used by many apps. Perhaps we should all just wait and see the details before you jump on the "OMG I'm being tracked, and the sky is falling" wagon.
If you are really paranoid about it, delete the darn file and there...Done!
Wounded, Apple will go on strike and remove all GPS from future devices now. ;)
If you are really paranoid about it, delete the darn file and there...Done!
Wounded, Apple will go on strike and remove all GPS from future devices now. ;)
Squire
Jul 15, 06:29 PM
The gap between Mac mini/iMac and PowerMac is simply too large for many people. :cool:
You could even take it a step further and say that the gap between the Mac mini and the (rumored) Mac Pro is too large. Why exclude the iMac? Well, for the consumer with a nice 20" LCD on his/her desk, the iMac is simply not an option.
Give us a Conroe-based tower, please. They could even keep the same basic case design across the board. Call the upper end ones "Mac Pro Extreme" or something. (I like the idea of offering a black anodized aluminum case to differentiate between Conroe- and Woodcrest-based systems.)
-Squire
You could even take it a step further and say that the gap between the Mac mini and the (rumored) Mac Pro is too large. Why exclude the iMac? Well, for the consumer with a nice 20" LCD on his/her desk, the iMac is simply not an option.
Give us a Conroe-based tower, please. They could even keep the same basic case design across the board. Call the upper end ones "Mac Pro Extreme" or something. (I like the idea of offering a black anodized aluminum case to differentiate between Conroe- and Woodcrest-based systems.)
-Squire
No comments:
Post a Comment